User talk:Cobalt327

Jump to: navigation, search

@@ Line 74: / Line 74: @@
 :::::::::Definitely in the ballpark, and it will be easy to change if we do this with a template. Yes, making this work might require making an "Undeveloped" category under every category. BTW I'm having second thoughts about recommending red text, only because it's the default color that the wiki uses for links to new articles with no content. For example [[This link to a nonexistent article]] is red.--[[User:Jon|Jon]] 11:26, 25 June 2012 (MDT)
 ::::::::::OK on the red text. Perhaps a different color or more weight and/or points for all or part... I'll play around w/it some more and see what comes of it.--[[User:Cobalt327|Cobalt327]] 12:07, 25 June 2012 (MDT)
+:::::::::::[http://www.crankshaftcoalition.com/wiki/Category:Electrical Here] is an interim save of the Electrical page w/some additions. The "Note:" directly below the title is a template. I removed the redundant title 'Electrical" from the field where I inserted the template. If different browsers require there to be the second title in that location it can be easily added back. I'm wondering if adding an "Electrical articles needed" template/page might be useful? As you know nothing is in stone, and '''''any or all''''' can be changed if this isn't what's needed.--[[User:Cobalt327|Cobalt327]] 03:37, 3 July 2012 (MDT)

Revision as of 05:37, 3 July 2012