User:Baiecisyv

<p> The situation is different with the Soviet Union, the development and production of China to build industrial base year, largely by means of a strong external aid, that the Soviet Union provided funding, technical, personnel and equipment, and various other aspects. Once the Sino-Soviet split, built on the basis of such assistance for industrial development, inevitably, has been greatly restricted. [ 4 ] can be seen,fake ray bans, if not the Soviet assistance, in full accordance with the then Soviet approach to industrial primitive accumulation, even at the expense of the interests of farmers, China is also difficult to quickly set up their own large-scale industrial basis.For China, not the Soviet practice of desirable addition to the above reasons, the most important but also that <strong>air max 90</strong> is not really suitable for China 's national conditions. This approach resulted in a considerable part of China's rural production and business elite, and even cheap nike shoes descendants have become the victim of a political movement. In order to accelerate industrial development, land reform, land ownership rid landlords, especially the nationalization of the land in the hands of large landowners, or distributed to landless peasants with little, and promote the reform of its co-operative steps, which should be implemented in all.</p><p>China is not serious about the trend of increasing concentration of land since the modern point of view,<strong><a href="" target="_blank">nike air max 90</a></strong>, in recent years has increasingly been recognized researchers. A basic fact is that almost all serious comparative study of the land around the country occupies survey researchers, can not but agree that in the past the rural population accounts for about 10% of the landlords and rich peasants occupy about 70-80 % of the land of the argument, is not accurate. Guo Dehong first analyzed before and after the founding of the Chinese Communist various percentages of statistical data, and concluded : landlords and rich peasants in the decades between the old China, accounting for about 9 households and population.</p><p>However,<strong><a href="x" target="_blank">cheap nike shoes</a></strong>, reducing the ratio of the number on this, still can not change the fact that China 's landlords and rich peasants with little more than half of the population occupies a lot of land. That's why, I believe the last statement, although Guo Dehong exaggerated, but believes the traditional view and revolutionary land reform movement fundamentally there is nothing wrong. For Guo Dehong is not complete, high- Ling Wang and Qin Hui and other apparently considers it necessary to get rid of statistical data on the kulaks, calculated separately landlords land tenure situation. The advantage is that such a distinction, both to avoid the rich peasants and landowners confused, tied the two pillars of landlordism, and also to avoid the false concept of the past kulak vague, improper calculation of statistical data.</p>

<p> The situation is different with the Soviet Union, the development and production of China to build industrial base year, largely by means of a strong external aid, that the Soviet Union provided funding, technical, personnel and equipment, and various other aspects. Once the Sino-Soviet split, built on the basis of such assistance for industrial development, inevitably, has been greatly restricted. [ 4 ] can be seen,fake ray bans, if not the Soviet assistance, in full accordance with the then Soviet approach to industrial primitive accumulation, even at the expense of the interests of farmers, China is also difficult to quickly set up their own large-scale industrial basis.For China, not the Soviet practice of desirable addition to the above reasons, the most important but also that <strong>air max 90</strong> is not really suitable for China 's national conditions. This approach resulted in a considerable part of China's rural production and business elite, and even cheap nike shoes descendants have become the victim of a political movement. In order to accelerate industrial development, land reform, land ownership rid landlords, especially the nationalization of the land in the hands of large landowners, or distributed to landless peasants with little, and promote the reform of its co-operative steps, which should be implemented in all.</p><p>China is not serious about the trend of increasing concentration of land since the modern point of view,<strong><a href="" target="_blank">nike air max 90</a></strong>, in recent years has increasingly been recognized researchers. A basic fact is that almost all serious comparative study of the land around the country occupies survey researchers, can not but agree that in the past the rural population accounts for about 10% of the landlords and rich peasants occupy about 70-80 % of the land of the argument, is not accurate. Guo Dehong first analyzed before and after the founding of the Chinese Communist various percentages of statistical data, and concluded : landlords and rich peasants in the decades between the old China, accounting for about 9 households and population.</p><p>However,<strong><a href="x" target="_blank">cheap nike shoes</a></strong>, reducing the ratio of the number on this, still can not change the fact that China 's landlords and rich peasants with little more than half of the population occupies a lot of land. That's why, I believe the last statement, although Guo Dehong exaggerated, but believes the traditional view and revolutionary land reform movement fundamentally there is nothing wrong. For Guo Dehong is not complete, high- Ling Wang and Qin Hui and other apparently considers it necessary to get rid of statistical data on the kulaks, calculated separately landlords land tenure situation. The advantage is that such a distinction, both to avoid the rich peasants and landowners confused, tied the two pillars of landlordism, and also to avoid the false concept of the past kulak vague, improper calculation of statistical data.</p>