1961-'63 Buick Special/Olds F-85 rear end conversion

Jump to: navigation, search
Line 11: Line 11:
 
I have been told that a Ford Fairmont rear from a late 70´s car is almost the same dimensions as the buick rear but in my research i have found that it is not a strong
 
I have been told that a Ford Fairmont rear from a late 70´s car is almost the same dimensions as the buick rear but in my research i have found that it is not a strong
 
unit. That leaves some other choices and that is obtaining a 8.5 10 bolt with the eyes on the carrier or a 12 bolt with the eyes on the carrier, or a 8.8 Ford rear with
 
unit. That leaves some other choices and that is obtaining a 8.5 10 bolt with the eyes on the carrier or a 12 bolt with the eyes on the carrier, or a 8.8 Ford rear with
the eyes on the carrier and have the housing cut and the spring pads relocated. The yoke on the carrier has a radical up angle that is not typical of the other GM cars.
+
the eyes on the carrier and have the housing cut and the spring pads relocated. The backing plate on the carrier has a radical angle that is not typical of the other GM cars. i wish this rear was a bit stronger and parts were available, because it is light!
All the components must be chosen initially before the driveshaft modification can be done.
+
 
Anyone having some knowledge or experience with this type of conversion, your comments/suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
+
email: bluesmax@juno.com for photos, my other email address has been terminated.
email: bluesmax@juno.com
+
  
 
I have gone 2 routes since i started this page.
 
I have gone 2 routes since i started this page.
 
I bought a 88 mustang 8.8 rear because it had the eyes on the carrier for the upper control arms. I later discovered that it was 4 inches too wide for the buick special. that is since gone, and then i purchased a 78 monte carlo 7.625 rear that is .5 inches narrower than the stock buick special rear. I made some lower control arm brackets and also a jig so that the placement of the brackets would be at the correct angle and spacing. The rear is in place now and fits great. I installed a powertrax differential before placing the rear under the car. I reccommend using 4.75 backspacing wheels or 5.00 bs wheels to get the proper fit in the rear wells.
 
I bought a 88 mustang 8.8 rear because it had the eyes on the carrier for the upper control arms. I later discovered that it was 4 inches too wide for the buick special. that is since gone, and then i purchased a 78 monte carlo 7.625 rear that is .5 inches narrower than the stock buick special rear. I made some lower control arm brackets and also a jig so that the placement of the brackets would be at the correct angle and spacing. The rear is in place now and fits great. I installed a powertrax differential before placing the rear under the car. I reccommend using 4.75 backspacing wheels or 5.00 bs wheels to get the proper fit in the rear wells.
 
I am now in the process of swapping out the dual path transmission to a 96 camaro T5 that i re-welded the tailshaft mount straight instead of the angle that it had for
 
I am now in the process of swapping out the dual path transmission to a 96 camaro T5 that i re-welded the tailshaft mount straight instead of the angle that it had for
the camaro/firebird mounting. I also had to re drill the bellhousing i bought and make a lower adapter for the T5. i chose to fabricate a cable clutch linkage because there just is not any room on the firewall for a master cylinder. I think that the cable will work fine and is easy to set up and adjust. if you would like to see photos, just email me at the above address.
+
the camaro/firebird mounting. I also had to re drill the bellhousing i bought (shroeder) and make a lower adapter for the T5. i chose to fabricate a cable clutch linkage because there just is not any room on the firewall for a master cylinder. I think that the cable will work fine and is easy to set up and adjust. if you would like to see photos, just email me at the above address.
  
 
today i attempted to install the T5 from the 96 camaro, and there is no way it will fit without removing a good portion of the tunnel which is what i did. now it is in and the shifter is almost in the perfect location. I am going to hunt for a hurst lever, to give it that old world look and put it in the perfect location for me. As you can see i am into the old school, innovation in action crowd.
 
today i attempted to install the T5 from the 96 camaro, and there is no way it will fit without removing a good portion of the tunnel which is what i did. now it is in and the shifter is almost in the perfect location. I am going to hunt for a hurst lever, to give it that old world look and put it in the perfect location for me. As you can see i am into the old school, innovation in action crowd.

Revision as of 19:29, 31 August 2011

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Categories
Toolbox