User talk:Cobalt327
m |
|||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
My question is, should this be a new category like what was done with 'Quadrajet carburetor', or should it be a page in 'Engine' like the two pages I mentioned above? My concern is creating too many categories. | My question is, should this be a new category like what was done with 'Quadrajet carburetor', or should it be a page in 'Engine' like the two pages I mentioned above? My concern is creating too many categories. | ||
| − | Or is there a way to use a | + | Or is there a way to use a bullet list in the different categories, i.e.: |
(Engine category, under "C") | (Engine category, under "C") | ||
| − | + | Camshaft page (containing the info I mentioned above like 'How the cam works', 'Types of cams', etc.) | |
| − | + | *Cam and compression ratio compatibility page | |
| − | + | *Camshaft install tips and tricks page | |
| − | + | *Et cetera? | |
There are other instances where this could put pages on a similar subject together under a heading- like the RPO codes we talked about earlier: | There are other instances where this could put pages on a similar subject together under a heading- like the RPO codes we talked about earlier: | ||
| − | + | RPO codes (containing an overview, etc.) | |
| − | + | *GM RPO build codes | |
| − | + | *General Motors build codes | |
| − | + | *More GM RPO codes | |
I would have tried this to see what it looked like and how it performed, but I seem to be unable to edit the list of pages in the categories like 'Engine'. | I would have tried this to see what it looked like and how it performed, but I seem to be unable to edit the list of pages in the categories like 'Engine'. | ||
--[[User:Cobalt327|Cobalt327]] 16:26, 17 February 2012 (MST) | --[[User:Cobalt327|Cobalt327]] 16:26, 17 February 2012 (MST) | ||
Your Privacy Choices