Editing Soda blasting
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | {{youcanedit}} | |
[[Image:65RollsRoyceSodaBlasted.jpg|350px|thumb|A 1965 Rolls Royce after being soda blasted.]] | [[Image:65RollsRoyceSodaBlasted.jpg|350px|thumb|A 1965 Rolls Royce after being soda blasted.]] | ||
Soda blasting is the use of sodium bicarbonate ("baking soda") or sodium bicarbonate-based materials as blast media for paint stripping. | Soda blasting is the use of sodium bicarbonate ("baking soda") or sodium bicarbonate-based materials as blast media for paint stripping. | ||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Soda blasting history== | ==Soda blasting history== | ||
− | Soda blasting was originally used as a method of stripping/cleaning industrial machinery. It was developed in the 1980's, and was most notably used | + | Soda blasting was originally used as a method of stripping/cleaning industrial machinery. It was developed in the 1980's, and was most notably used to restore the Statue of Liberty. |
Soda blasting crossed over into the automotive restoration field as somewhat of a miracle process, a misconception that had to be debunked. Although soda has its valid uses as a blast medium, it also has its own set of complexities and nuances that must be taken into consideration. | Soda blasting crossed over into the automotive restoration field as somewhat of a miracle process, a misconception that had to be debunked. Although soda has its valid uses as a blast medium, it also has its own set of complexities and nuances that must be taken into consideration. | ||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
*Paint manufacturers advise against its use. | *Paint manufacturers advise against its use. | ||
*Can't re-use the medium after blasting. | *Can't re-use the medium after blasting. | ||
− | |||
Overall, soda blasting is probably not the best choice for the hobbyist or do-it-yourselfer. | Overall, soda blasting is probably not the best choice for the hobbyist or do-it-yourselfer. | ||
Line 87: | Line 86: | ||
This opinion is expanded upon in [http://spi.forumup.org/viewtopic.php?t=156&mforum=spi this discussion in the Southern Polyurethanes forums]. | This opinion is expanded upon in [http://spi.forumup.org/viewtopic.php?t=156&mforum=spi this discussion in the Southern Polyurethanes forums]. | ||
− | + | *[http://www.search-autoparts.com/searchautoparts/article/articleDetail.jsp?id=130652 John Hughes, Ford Motor Company refinish technical expert]: | |
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
''"We don't recommend sodium bicarbonate, because you can’t clean it out of the pores of the metal well enough."'' | ''"We don't recommend sodium bicarbonate, because you can’t clean it out of the pores of the metal well enough."'' | ||
Line 98: | Line 97: | ||
===BASF=== | ===BASF=== | ||
− | + | Awaiting response. | |
===DuPont=== | ===DuPont=== | ||
Line 104: | Line 103: | ||
===Kirker=== | ===Kirker=== | ||
− | Reprinted with permission: | + | The use of soda blasting does not specifically void any warranty that Kirker may offer, but they do indeed discourage its use as a prep step. Reprinted verbatim with permission: |
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
Line 120: | Line 119: | ||
===Sherwin-Williams=== | ===Sherwin-Williams=== | ||
− | The use of soda blasting does not nullify Sherwin Williams' warranty. However, Sherwin WIlliams discourages its use. | + | The use of soda blasting does not nullify Sherwin Williams's warranty. However, Sherwin WIlliams discourages its use. |
− | Michael Pellett, a representative from Sherwin-Williams' Dallas Automotive Training Center [http://www.hotrodders.com/forum/once-all-wiki-soda-blasting-162700-4.html#post1160667 has stated]: | + | Michael Pellett, a representative from Sherwin-Williams's Dallas Automotive Training Center [http://www.hotrodders.com/forum/once-all-wiki-soda-blasting-162700-4.html#post1160667 has stated]: |
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
''Like most paint companies, we have experienced poor results in the past regarding this process as a surface preparation step. We actively discourage our customers from utilizing this process by explaining the potential problems and offering other alternatives.'' | ''Like most paint companies, we have experienced poor results in the past regarding this process as a surface preparation step. We actively discourage our customers from utilizing this process by explaining the potential problems and offering other alternatives.'' | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
− | For more detail, see the text of | + | For more detail, see the text of [[:Image:Sherwin-WilliamsWarranty.pdf|the Sherwin Williams warranty]]. |
===Sikkens=== | ===Sikkens=== | ||
− | + | Awaiting response. | |
===SPI=== | ===SPI=== | ||
Line 136: | Line 135: | ||
===Valspar=== | ===Valspar=== | ||
− | + | Awaiting response. | |
==Related articles== | ==Related articles== | ||
Line 154: | Line 153: | ||
*[http://armex.com/CaseStudies/casestudy0102.aspx Armex automotive and aerospace case studies] | *[http://armex.com/CaseStudies/casestudy0102.aspx Armex automotive and aerospace case studies] | ||
− | |||
− | |||
[[Category:Body and exterior]] | [[Category:Body and exterior]] | ||
[[Category:Garage and shop]] | [[Category:Garage and shop]] |