Choosing a stall converter

Jump to: navigation, search
Line 9: Line 9:
 
begins to jump forward. Or the tires go up in smoke, depending on your combo.
 
begins to jump forward. Or the tires go up in smoke, depending on your combo.
 
That is your "flash stall".
 
That is your "flash stall".
 
 
Now, repeat, but this time keep your left foot on the brake pedal, hard. But don't do it for more than a couple of
 
Now, repeat, but this time keep your left foot on the brake pedal, hard. But don't do it for more than a couple of
 
seconds, then do a gentle drive afterward. Assuming you didn't just shred the tires, that was your "foot-brake
 
seconds, then do a gentle drive afterward. Assuming you didn't just shred the tires, that was your "foot-brake
Line 33: Line 32:
 
The converter was an 1800-stall. I could, occasionally, chirp a tire from a dead stop. But i soon got curious
 
The converter was an 1800-stall. I could, occasionally, chirp a tire from a dead stop. But i soon got curious
 
about the [b]converter slippage[/b]: Cruising along at 55 MPH, lift off the throttle, the RPM instantly dropped 200 RPM. Ease back into it, it came back up by 200 RPM. In later years, I came to learn that this is typical of most stock GM converters, though I doubted, and still doubt, that that converter was stock.
 
about the [b]converter slippage[/b]: Cruising along at 55 MPH, lift off the throttle, the RPM instantly dropped 200 RPM. Ease back into it, it came back up by 200 RPM. In later years, I came to learn that this is typical of most stock GM converters, though I doubted, and still doubt, that that converter was stock.
   
+
  But then I tried it the other way: stomping the gas, RPM climbed another 200 RPM. Did that mean a total of 400 RPM
But then I tried it the other way: stomping the gas, RPM climbed another 200 RPM. Did that mean a total of 400 RPM
+
 
of slippage? I lifted off. Yes, a total slip at WOT of 400 RPM. Again, fairly typical it turns out.
 
of slippage? I lifted off. Yes, a total slip at WOT of 400 RPM. Again, fairly typical it turns out.
   
+
  Lesson learned: normal slip of torque converters. Also applies to lockup style when not locked.
Lesson learned: normal slip of torque converters. Also applies to lockup style when not locked.
+
  
 
Combo 2: '78 Camaro LG3 ( 145-HP 305 ) TH350, swapped stock 1200-stall for B&M TorkMaster 2000 converter, 3.08:1
 
Combo 2: '78 Camaro LG3 ( 145-HP 305 ) TH350, swapped stock 1200-stall for B&M TorkMaster 2000 converter, 3.08:1
 
axle, 235/70R15 tires.
 
axle, 235/70R15 tires.
 
 
I know this converter was stock, I know it was 1200 RPM flash stall, I know the slippage was the same as my 'bird
 
I know this converter was stock, I know it was 1200 RPM flash stall, I know the slippage was the same as my 'bird
 
already described above, and I know it drove fine for granny. But I decided to swap it.
 
already described above, and I know it drove fine for granny. But I decided to swap it.
 
The B&M gave my combo a 1700 RPM flash stall, [b]the launch[/b] felt much better. It felt like I had swapped to a 350, when launching. And by launching, I mean flooring the gas the instant the light went from red to green. It pushed me into the seat noticeably more, and I loved it.  I thought I had invested wisely, and I felt I got what I paid for.
 
The B&M gave my combo a 1700 RPM flash stall, [b]the launch[/b] felt much better. It felt like I had swapped to a 350, when launching. And by launching, I mean flooring the gas the instant the light went from red to green. It pushed me into the seat noticeably more, and I loved it.  I thought I had invested wisely, and I felt I got what I paid for.
   
+
  But I was in for another surprise. I finally stopped playing in traffic and got on the highway. I was so stunned
But I was in for another surprise. I finally stopped playing in traffic and got on the highway. I was so stunned
+
 
to discover my slippage wasn't 200 RPM. It was just 50 RPM! So I stomped the go pedal, the RPM shot up by another
 
to discover my slippage wasn't 200 RPM. It was just 50 RPM! So I stomped the go pedal, the RPM shot up by another
 
350, for a total of 400.
 
350, for a total of 400.
   
+
  I didn't bother to check my MPG, this carb was also leaky, and I always did 17 MPG, same as with the 2.41:1 axle
I didn't bother to check my MPG, this carb was also leaky, and I always did 17 MPG, same as with the 2.41:1 axle
+
 
it had before. But that aside, I know it would help MPG. After all, my previous '78 / LG3 / TH350 / 1200 / 2.41:1
 
it had before. But that aside, I know it would help MPG. After all, my previous '78 / LG3 / TH350 / 1200 / 2.41:1
 
/ 205-75R14 Camaro did 23 MPG with a best of 26.
 
/ 205-75R14 Camaro did 23 MPG with a best of 26.
   
+
  I can't say the 2000-stall drove better than the 1200-stall in the snow, but I can say it wasn't any worse.
I can't say the 2000-stall drove better than the 1200-stall in the snow, but I can say it wasn't any worse.
+
  
 
Combo 3 was a friend's '65 Mustang. It had an 8.3:1 302 with Roush 200 heads, a Comp Magnum 292 cam, headers,
 
Combo 3 was a friend's '65 Mustang. It had an 8.3:1 302 with Roush 200 heads, a Comp Magnum 292 cam, headers,
 
intake, carb, 3500-stall, C4, 3.80:1 spool. Tires were 25" diameter.
 
intake, carb, 3500-stall, C4, 3.80:1 spool. Tires were 25" diameter.
   
+
  That thing needed 10.5:1 compression, but a full summer of tuning got it driveable. To the point that he swapped
That thing needed 10.5:1 compression, but a full summer of tuning got it driveable. To the point that he swapped
+
 
street radials for drag tires. Then we went out to the exact center of nowhere, did up the 5-point race harnesses,
 
street radials for drag tires. Then we went out to the exact center of nowhere, did up the 5-point race harnesses,
 
and he let it fly.
 
and he let it fly.
   
+
  If you've ever felt a jet plane on takeoff, this puts them all to shame. Nothing you've ever experienced at any
If you've ever felt a jet plane on takeoff, this puts them all to shame. Nothing you've ever experienced at any
+
 
amusement park even comes close, either. This was like God's own pillow-covered sledgehammer to the heiney.
 
amusement park even comes close, either. This was like God's own pillow-covered sledgehammer to the heiney.
   
+
  First experiences are always more vivid than follow-ups, and that's the case here. This wasn't to be my last
First experiences are always more vivid than follow-ups, and that's the case here. This wasn't to be my last
+
 
experience with race converters, but it was an eye-opener.
 
experience with race converters, but it was an eye-opener.
  
 
Following that, I was playing with an '85 Camaro with a mildly modified L69, 700R-4, 3.42:1, and sticky 215/60R15s. I decided on a B&M TorkMaster 2400. It drove pretty stock, until I swapped the heads. Finally it all came together:
 
Following that, I was playing with an '85 Camaro with a mildly modified L69, 700R-4, 3.42:1, and sticky 215/60R15s. I decided on a B&M TorkMaster 2400. It drove pretty stock, until I swapped the heads. Finally it all came together:
 
No traction in first gear, very very fun!
 
No traction in first gear, very very fun!
 
 
Driveability? Not annoying, not irritating, not aggravating. Snow? no clue. Rain? easy to drive, but stomp the fun
 
Driveability? Not annoying, not irritating, not aggravating. Snow? no clue. Rain? easy to drive, but stomp the fun
 
pedal, and no traction in first or second gears.  
 
pedal, and no traction in first or second gears.  
Line 86: Line 75:
 
Great tragedy I never tried it in any snow, in either car.  
 
Great tragedy I never tried it in any snow, in either car.  
 
So, the combo is everything.
 
So, the combo is everything.
 +
 
If you're studying the COMP CAMS catalog, for example, you'll note that once you look past the smallest cams, they
 
If you're studying the COMP CAMS catalog, for example, you'll note that once you look past the smallest cams, they
 
begin noting stall speeds. But as with all things camshaft, these are for the popular engine.   
 
begin noting stall speeds. But as with all things camshaft, these are for the popular engine.   
If you're gonna pick a cam for a lesser-displacement version, read the notes for the next larger cam.  
+
If you're gonna pick a cam for a lesser-displacement version, read the notes for the next larger cam.
 +
 
For racing, you want a stall about 500 RPM below the RPM at which your engine makes peak torque. For most mild
 
For racing, you want a stall about 500 RPM below the RPM at which your engine makes peak torque. For most mild
 
SBC 350s, torque peak is typically 3500 RPM. With Vortec heads and such, 4000 is more like it. AFR heads should
 
SBC 350s, torque peak is typically 3500 RPM. With Vortec heads and such, 4000 is more like it. AFR heads should
raise that to 4500.  
+
raise that to 4500.
 +
 
Choosing converters is also about [b]size[/b]. Stock SBC converters are about 300 MM, which is nearly 12". They're
 
Choosing converters is also about [b]size[/b]. Stock SBC converters are about 300 MM, which is nearly 12". They're
 
referring to the outer diameter of the whole converter.  
 
referring to the outer diameter of the whole converter.  
 
Why it matters?  
 
Why it matters?  
 
My TM2400, above, was a loose 12". That looseness is most of why it was able to slip 1200 RPM all the time. Had it
 
My TM2400, above, was a loose 12". That looseness is most of why it was able to slip 1200 RPM all the time. Had it
been a tight 10.5", still 2400 flash stall, it would have been much less slip, and much less irritating.  
+
been a tight 10.5", still 2400 flash stall, it would have been much less slip, and much less irritating.
So, this bit about [b]loose or tight[/b]:
+
 +
So, this bit about loose or tight:
 
Loose converters are great when your static compression is way low, or way high. Way high, a loose converter helps
 
Loose converters are great when your static compression is way low, or way high. Way high, a loose converter helps
 
reduce detonation. Way low, it covers the soggy off-idle. And a cam that's way too big is the same soggy feel as
 
reduce detonation. Way low, it covers the soggy off-idle. And a cam that's way too big is the same soggy feel as
way low compression.  
+
way low compression.
[b]Efficiency[/b]: This is difficult to discuss. Look back at my '78 Camaro. The TM2k was much more efficient than
+
 +
Efficiency: This is difficult to discuss. Look back at my '78 Camaro. The TM2k was much more efficient than
 
the stock converter it replaced, and was also more efficient than what was in my '79 Firebird.  
 
the stock converter it replaced, and was also more efficient than what was in my '79 Firebird.  
 
But how to tell, the reduced slip at cruise? Partly.  That it had that plus the better launch? Mostly.  
 
But how to tell, the reduced slip at cruise? Partly.  That it had that plus the better launch? Mostly.  
So my TM2400 wasn't efficient? Correct.  
+
So my TM2400 wasn't efficient? Correct.
Are all converters [b]rated[/b] by the same standards? NO!
+
 +
Are all converters rated by the same standards? NO!
 
Watch some vids on You-Tube where guys have recorded their gauges while driving around. I watched mostly LS1 F-car
 
Watch some vids on You-Tube where guys have recorded their gauges while driving around. I watched mostly LS1 F-car
 
guys' vids, but that's enough to illustrate the point. Yes, their results are combination-dependant, but I watched
 
guys' vids, but that's enough to illustrate the point. Yes, their results are combination-dependant, but I watched
a 4000-stall drive tighter than  my 2400 stall. And at 4000 stall, it's not just the smaller diameter.  
+
a 4000-stall drive tighter than  my 2400 stall. And at 4000 stall, it's not just the smaller diameter.
[b]Gas mileage[/b]: My 2400 most definitely did hurt my LT1's MPG, in town and on the highway. But would that 2000
+
 +
Gas mileage: My 2400 most definitely did hurt my LT1's MPG, in town and on the highway. But would that 2000
 
have helped my '78 in town, had I fixed the carb, and acted mature when lights went green? Probably.
 
have helped my '78 in town, had I fixed the carb, and acted mature when lights went green? Probably.
 
It's not as simple as less stall = more MPG.  
 
It's not as simple as less stall = more MPG.  
 
Engines can lug to the point it's un-mistakeable, but like detonation, there are lesser levels where the driver
 
Engines can lug to the point it's un-mistakeable, but like detonation, there are lesser levels where the driver
really can't tell. And if your converter is too tight, it will hurt your MPG.  
+
really can't tell. And if your converter is too tight, it will hurt your MPG.
[b]Performance[/b]: Is it all in the launch? Nope. The instant after an upshift is called the shift recovery. And
+
 +
Performance: Is it all in the launch? Nope. The instant after an upshift is called the shift recovery. And
 
with an automatic, how much the RPM drops from the upshift isn't controlled by gear ratios alone. Yep, we're back
 
with an automatic, how much the RPM drops from the upshift isn't controlled by gear ratios alone. Yep, we're back
 
to the converter. And it's effect on performance after the upshift is more pronounced with a wide-ratio 700R-4
 
to the converter. And it's effect on performance after the upshift is more pronounced with a wide-ratio 700R-4
 
than with a close-ratio TH350. With the TH350, the launch is what the converter helps most.  
 
than with a close-ratio TH350. With the TH350, the launch is what the converter helps most.  
 
But with more gear, you need more stall.  
 
But with more gear, you need more stall.  
Torque converters are much more sensitive to [b]load[/b] than to engine torque.  
+
Torque converters are much more sensitive to load than to engine torque.  
 
More gear reduces the load that the converter feels. Same with taking weight out of the car. But not only that,
 
More gear reduces the load that the converter feels. Same with taking weight out of the car. But not only that,
 
having more gear also takes load off the transmission, helping it survive stoplight antics.
 
having more gear also takes load off the transmission, helping it survive stoplight antics.
[b]When to buy what[/b]?
+
When to buy what?
 
Should this be an early mod? Or later, after everything else?
 
Should this be an early mod? Or later, after everything else?
 
The first mod in the drivetrain should be making sure you're not running a 2.73:1 axle ratio with 26" tires. With
 
The first mod in the drivetrain should be making sure you're not running a 2.73:1 axle ratio with 26" tires. With

Revision as of 19:52, 22 December 2011

Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Navigation
Categories
Toolbox