User:2mlh0godney
2mlh0godney (Talk | contribs) (→Gras: new section) |
2mlh0godney (Talk | contribs) |
||
Line 369: | Line 369: | ||
<li>Its cheap jrdan shoes Just the Key< li> | <li>Its cheap jrdan shoes Just the Key< li> | ||
+ | |||
+ | < ul> | ||
+ | |||
+ | of the District Court for the Northern District of California ruled in 2012 in favor of Google when it decided that the APIs could not be copyrighted,cheap air jordans. < p> | ||
+ | <p> But the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ruled in May that the Java API packages could indeed be copyrighted,real cheap jordans retro, and asked the district court to find if Google's use could be considered as "fair use." The jury had previously deadlocked on fair use. Google has asked the Supreme Court to review the Federal Circuit decision,, which has large implications on current practices in developing software,cheap jordans online, according to the scientists. < p> | ||
+ | <p> ",;When programmers can freely reimplement or reverse engineer an API without obtaining a costly license or risking a lawsuit, they can create compatible software that the interface's original creator might never have envisioned or had the resources to develop,cheap jordans," according to their brief. < p> | ||
+ | <aside class="nativo-promo tablet desktop" id=""> | ||
+ | < aside> | ||
+ | <p> The computer scientists gave instances of many key developments, including the IBM PC clone business, the C programming language and the Internet that benefited from the absence of copyrights on interfaces. < p> | ||
+ | <p> The freedom to reimplement APIs also helps developers rescue "orphan" software or data in systems that are no longer supported by their creators, according to the filing. < p> | ||
+ | <p> If APIs can fall under copyright, then "API creators would have veto rights over any developer who wants to create a compatible program," regardless of whether any literal<ul> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <li>< li> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <li>< li> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <li>FB< li> | ||
< ul> | < ul> |